T4America Blog

News, press releases and other updates

3 ways the Senate can pass bipartisan and effective transportation policy

We need you to take action to fix this broken bill. Send a message to your Senators TONIGHT > >

This past weekend, the Senate Environment and Public Works Committee released their proposal to reauthorize surface transportation policy for the next five years. The bill has bipartisan support, but it undermines both parties’ stated goals. A bipartisan and effective bill is possible—here’s how. 

Some current and former members of the Senate EPW Committee and the House of Representatives at a press conference in 2016. Photo by Senate Democrats.

At Transportation for America, often our efforts to enact policies that actually connect people to jobs and services—not build new roads to nowhere—are stymied by “bipartisanship.” Or what people think is bipartisanship. 

To us, bipartisanship isn’t passing transportation policy that just makes our problems worse, even if it undermines Republican and Democratic priorities equally as the status quo approach does. The Senate Environment and Public Works Committee is proposing more of the same. And where this new, bipartisan bill does seek to solve problems, it does so through several new and exciting, but toothless and/or underfunded programs. 

Bipartisan legislation should solve problems, not make existing ones worse. And bipartisan transportation policy is possible—just ask the House Transportation and Infrastructure Committee, where freshmen members on both sides of the aisle joined together to pack their reauthorization proposal with programs that would fundamentally improve the federal transportation program. 

Here are three bipartisan policies that we urge Senate Environment and Public Works Committee members to incorporate into their reauthorization proposal at mark-up tomorrow. 

1. Fix-it-first

Lawmakers on both sides of the aisle have long-proclaimed the need to fix our “crumbling roads and bridges.” Yet despite continuously increasing federal transportation funding, this never gets accomplished—because states aren’t required to spend federal funding on maintenance before expansion. 

The Senate EPW Committee should require that sponsors of roadway expansion projects demonstrate that they can operate and maintain what they are building while making improvements in the state of repair. This common sense amendment was proposed by a Democrat and Republican in the House Transportation and Infrastructure Committee last summer and passed by unanimous consent. 

2. Measure and prioritize access equitably 

The federal transportation program should prioritize investments that actually connect people to the things they need, by all modes. This is also called “getting the most bang for your buck.” Yet for decades, lawmakers on both sides of the aisle have agreed to focus on increasing vehicle speed by pouring money into expanded roadways—even though not every American can afford to own or operate a vehicle, and expanding roadways only makes traffic worse. 

Measuring access to jobs and essential services and targeting federal funds to projects that improve access should be something that both political parties can enthusiastically support. It ensures that federal funds aren’t wasted and that funding can be equitably spent on rural access by developing a better understanding of rural transportation needs through data. It also improves access to the economy particularly for low-income people, communities of color, and people with disabilities. It is modern and makes more sense to the taxpayer than “delay” and “level of service.” 

3. Prohibit negative safety targets 

The number of people killed while walking is skyrocketing, but particularly in southern and Sun Belt states like Florida, New Mexico, and Alabama. Yet current law allows states to plan for more people to be killed than in the previous year with no penalties. 

Prohibiting states from setting these destructive negative safety targets can be an easy issue for both parties to agree on. It would also make a huge difference in incentivizing states to spend Highway Safety Improvement Program funds on safety improvements for people who bike and walk. 

Bipartisanship is only good if it produces good legislation

Ultimately, achieving Democrats and Republicans’ transportation goals doesn’t require vastly different policy proposals. Here’s what we wrote on the Senate Environment and Public Works Committee’s very similar 2019 bill: 

“While Republicans say their priority is to reduce demand for federal spending, avoid wasteful spending and efficiently move goods to market, the current program and the bill they passed fails to do so. While Democrats claim to want to create jobs, reduce emissions, and build a strong and fair economy, the current program and the bill they passed fails to do so.” 

Achieving all of this is possible by fundamentally updating the federal transportation program to finally invest in getting people where they need to go by all modes, safely, sustainably, conveniently, equitably, and affordably. 

Passing a status quo bill that just makes congestion worse, our streets less safe, our emissions higher, and access to opportunities more inequitable is not the bipartisan deal we should accept.  This is not something to praise or be excited about.

We must hold both parties to a higher standard: because a bipartisan and effective bill is more than possible. 

7 Comments

  1. Susan De Vos

    4 months ago

    How is this related to what the House Committee will propose?

  2. Steven Yaffe

    4 months ago

    Any transportation reauthorization bill should require continuous pathways along arterial & collector roads

  3. Joe Adams

    4 months ago

    After promising an extensive and overhaul of the nation’s highways as an ongoing campaign promise which they failed to even begin meaningful work on the Republican party is now actually obstructing this extremely important issue. It’s time for leaders in both parties to become just that. Leaders. Our children and future generations are looking to this government to secure their future needs.

  4. Maureen Reed

    4 months ago

    Fix this bill. The health of our nation needs to address the safety issues of human life. Pedestrians and bicyclist need to become the priority. Cars speeding is so out of control. A bill without including pedestrians and bicyclist in 2021 does no one any good. Get out there and see for yourself. Where is input from people who walk and ride every day putting our very lives in danger.

  5. Gregory Wright

    4 months ago

    My state of California and the entire country needs to move to Universal Pay-How-You-Drive Car Insurance to achieve a wide range of benefits, including:
    decarbonization,
    greater roadway safety,
    insurance-cost equity,
    reduction in police-motorist interaction, and even
    vehicle noise pollution reduction.
    I’ve been working on this for a decade — with no serious interest or results. Until user-based PHYD is the ONLY form of auto liability insurance available, this low-hanging multiple-benefits, anti-pedestrian/bicyclist death intervention will, sadly, be very under-utilized in making U.S. roadways less lethal, polluting, equitable, noisy and safe. Anyone who wants to help take up this cause should contact me at [email protected].

  6. Robert Rands

    4 months ago

    Unfortunately, Democrats’ noble words do not match the realities that they are pushing. It is less accessibility, usability & connection that is being pushed, not more. The failure to offer comprehensive, well-designed and safe roads, but rather, compromise for all, less safety, less usability and less access, cannot be called anything like “bipartisanship”, but rather, simply, partisan, antagonistic radical ideas being foisted upon the people against their will.

    The refusal to listen to any others than those spouting the same, has severely sabotaged any claim to bipartisanship, or even science or good design, as even within the communities claimed to support these ideas, there is a split.

    The failures that have resulted in such an unprecedented spike in injuries, accidents and deaths must, as well, be recognized for its failures and these must be addressed. To claim that failure is one of the main reason to continue with failed ideas and designs goes beyond negligent to criminal.

    Come back with a better plan.

  7. TIM PORTER

    4 months ago

    I agree these offerings are BS. We need to go back to interurbans, streetcars, and add light rail and high speed rail. ALL are much cheaper and allow more access than roads and expensive automobiles.