T4America Blog

News, press releases and other updates

From policy to action: Six things USDOT should do yesterday to maximize the potential of the infrastructure deal

Because of the shortcomings in the Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act (IIJA)’s actual policy, an enormous amount of pressure now rests on USDOT and Secretary Buttigieg to deliver on the administration’s promises. But the good news is that there are scores of actions that USDOT can take to deliver positive outcomes for equity, climate, safety, state of repair, and enhancing community connections.

entrance to the USDOT headquarters
Image by U.S. Department of Transportation
promo graphic for a guide to the IIJA

This post is part of T4America’s suite of materials explaining the 2021 $1.2 trillion Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act (IIJA), which governs all federal transportation policy and funding through 2026. What do you need to know about the new infrastructure law? We know that federal transportation policy can be intimidating and confusing. Our hub for the new law will walk you through it, from the basics all the way to more complex details.

After 200+ weeks of #InfrastructureWeek, Congress was sorely overdue to take action on surface transportation reauthorization since the FAST Act was fast expiring in 2021. The House took up the challenge by crafting and passing the bold five-year INVEST Act in July, which would have moved the needle in major ways. But the Senate failed to produce the same kind of transformative bill, instead playing the politics of “compromise” and “bipartisanship” in what would become the infrastructure deal as we know it (the IIJA). 

With the conclusion of #InfrastructureWeek on Capitol Hill and Congress pivoting to other issues of national interest, the media spotlight on the US transportation program will quickly dim.  

This is unfortunate, because in many ways, the real work on infrastructure is just beginning—especially for USDOT and the administration. Advocates and the media are failing to grasp that the first year of transportation funding from the IIJA is already flowing out to states and metro areas, supercharging project lists that were decided upon years ago in some cases. And states have made it clear that they plan to maximize the use of the flexibility that they have won from Congress to spend this money how they deem it in their interest.

Using this historic infusion of infrastructure funding to make meaningful progress towards equity, climate change, and fostering community economic opportunities is going to be an uphill battle, but that is what the Biden administration has promised. They certainly have the talent and the expertise to make it happen, but Secretary Buttigieg will need to exercise his authority and the flexibility of US transportation policy to realize these outcomes. 

Over the next few weeks, we will unpack the details on a range of actions that could be taken administratively to further our three principles and national priorities of economic development, equity, and climate change mitigation. For now, here are six immediate and important actions that would make a big difference:

1. A new commitment to passenger rail needs equally committed leaders.

As the country begins a heavy investment in intercity passenger rail and Amtrak, its Board of Directors is made up of members whose terms have expired (other than Transportation Secretary Buttigieg and Amtrak CEO Flynn). It is time for the President to nominate a new and current Board to lead Amtrak through this unprecedented opportunity to create a world class passenger rail system and push Amtrak to deliver on a new customer driven service delivery mission.

2. Find other ways to prioritize safety.

In late October, Secretary Buttigieg cited the country’s unacceptable traffic death “crisis”:

We cannot and should not accept these fatalities as simply a part of everyday life in America. No one will accomplish this alone. It will take all levels of government, industries, advocates, engineers and communities across the country working together toward the day when family members no longer have to say good-bye to loved ones because of a traffic crash.

—Secretary Buttigieg

With a call to action on safety, the USDOT should bring more attention to the impact of roadway design on safety, including the removal of references to the disproven 40-year old study that claimed 94 percent of crashes are caused by human error and discouraging grantees and the press from using the term ‘accident’ as opposed to ‘crash.’ Furthermore, the USDOT can look to prioritize safety investments across all funding streams (more on that next).

3. Bake important priorities into the many competitive grant programs.

Use competitive grant programs to reward project sponsors that have made a dedicated commitment to safety, state of repair, climate, and equity and to focus the sponsors that have not on addressing those issues. For example, those states who set regressive safety targets could be restricted from getting funding for safety-oriented projects.

4. Require clearer data for the public on transportation emissions.

Track climate emissions per capita from transportation by state and publish results and trends online.

5. Consider the poor track record of transportation models.

Require major NEPA (environmental review) documents to include a report on the past accuracy of any transportation demand modeling used, as well as documenting the expected induced demand from projects.

6. Streamline the arduous process of applying for competitive grants.

The IIJA also establishes several new competitive grant programs. To ensure they are accessible to communities of all sizes and capacity, USDOT should create an easier, more automated process for receiving applications and benefit-cost analyses for all competitive grant programs.


How this historic bill gets implemented and how the hundreds of billions in new transportation spending is spent will determine how far we are able to move the needle on key goals. We will continue to unpack more ways that the administration, states, metros, and advocates can engage in the implementation of the IIJA to produce a transportation system that is safer, cleaner, and more effective at connecting people to jobs and opportunity.

7 Comments

  1. Vaughan Mostert

    10 months ago

    Further to point no 1 – all over the world, passenger transport organisations (rail and bus) tend to grant board members and senior management free travel on the services they run. It’s time to turn this unhelpful practice around and start paying a percentage of board members’ fees in the form of vouchers that expire within say, three months. If they can’t use these vouchers themselves, they can give them to their friends as gifts. The same goes for top management. I would like to think that this will help to focus a few minds!

    • Joe Trudo

      10 months ago

      Fantastic idea! Thanks for presenting this scheme.

  2. Donna

    10 months ago

    I’m concerned that our climate’s magic “solution” will focus on electric cars. Electric vehicles YES for transit, delivery trucks, school busses. For the general public?? It may help a little but will easily exacerbate the demand for more roads,(resources/habitat destruction) (as people drive more), urban sprawl, traffic deaths and disabling injuries, increased obesity and physical inactivity. As a prime example, my neighbor and I were going to a restaurant one mile away. Let’s walk, I suggested. “We don’t need to walk, we can drive! I have my electric car” People feel better about “driving” because they’re “helping” the environment. (good grief) and naturally the electric car auto makers sell this idea.
    The real solution? Walk/bus/transit

  3. Mike Erickson

    10 months ago

    Good comments Donna…same old plans for highways same old results, cars cars cars electric or otherwise will keep the crashes coming, the congestion, the sprawl, and a whole new slew of unforseen environmental disasters. We need more walk, bike, transit and high speed rail and less cars no matter the propellent.

  4. The single biggest problem will be that state govs can largely continue to finance highway widening, subsidies to manufacturers, and still refuse to support transit projects. Advocate for giving money to MPOs that have balanced regional plans and to rural organizations instead. There is a deeper problem. Alabama wants to give its unused Covid 19 money for 3 new prisons instead of to transit, emergency evacuation systems, water supply to poor communities, etc..This could be a repeat of southern states who refused to take money for Medicaid expansion.

  5. Dana Gabbard

    10 months ago

    On point no.1 when I asked a prominent advocate about how much influence advocates will have on the Amtrak Board nominations he said zilch, as these traditionally are patronage (i.e. payoffs to insiders and big donors) to burnish egos. Look at 49 U.S. Code § 24302(a)(1)(C). How many appointees over the years have fit its description of qualifications? Especially of “representatives of employees or users of passenger rail transportation”. At least this most untransparent of bodies will now have to hold an annual public meeting to take comments on service and finances. And Amtrak employee unions and disability advocates will also have annual meetings with the Board. Which I guess is putting on us on the road to a more informed Board, one hopes.

  6. barry

    9 months ago

    I like the suggestions for how US DOT should run competitive grant programs, but there is a weakness on the state/local level, our RI DOT applies for grants without public input (the state’s TIP calls for almost everything so they have wide discretion) and recently it ha mostly been for highway capacity expansion – what are good practices at the state and local level to ensure better grant applications?