<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Transportation For America &#187; lautenberg</title>
	<atom:link href="http://t4america.org/tag/lautenberg/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://t4america.org</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 15:52:51 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>What does the FREIGHT Act really mean for our freight and ports?</title>
		<link>http://t4america.org/blog/2010/07/23/what-does-the-freight-act-really-mean-for-our-freight-and-ports/</link>
		<comments>http://t4america.org/blog/2010/07/23/what-does-the-freight-act-really-mean-for-our-freight-and-ports/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Jul 2010 19:31:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Stephen Lee Davis</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Campaign Blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cantwell]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[featured]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[freight]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FREIGHT Act]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lautenberg]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[murray]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ports]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[senate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[senator]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://t4america.org/?p=6889</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<img src="http://farm5.static.flickr.com/4014/4361016865_ebe5a7b202_m.jpg" class="alignright" width="130" />The new FREIGHT Act introduced by Senators Lautenberg, Murray and Cantwell would create a truly multimodal national freight program for the first time in the U.S. It recognizes that our freight system should move our goods from coast to coast while also being part of the solution for many of our most pressing problems: air quality, dangerous emissions, oil dependence, and congestion on our highways and interstates.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<table style="background-color: #f8f8f8; margin-top: 10px; margin-right: 0px; margin-bottom: 10px; margin-left: 10px; height: 100px; border: 1px solid #b9d2e9;" cellpadding="5" width="100" align="right">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td><a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/taylar/4361016865/"><img class="alignnone size-medium wp-image-6891" title="Port of Oakland" src="http://t4america.org/wp-content/uploads/2010/07/4361016865_ebe5a7b202_z-400x281.jpg" alt="" width="320" height="225" /></a></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><span style="font-size: 11.5px; line-height: 14px;"><a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/taylar/4361016865/">Port of Oakland</a> originally uploaded by <a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/taylar/">ingridtaylar</a></span></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p>There were a few questions bouncing around via Twitter and elsewhere about the new FREIGHT Act introduced yesterday by Senators Lautenberg, Murray and Cantwell. <a href="http://t4america.org/pressers/2010/07/23/senators-lautenberg-murray-and-cantwell-introduce-legislation-for-new-freight-program/">We issued a joint press release</a> with a few other groups, but it&#8217;s worth spelling out in plain language some of the benefits of the bill.</p>
<p>For context, it&#8217;s worth understanding how freight transportation policy currently works now to understand how much of an improvement this bill would provide.</p>
<p>Today, there is no national freight program or specific national policy. There&#8217;s no dedicated federal transportation money that states, regions or ports can spend to improve throughput or operations at ports, intermodal facilities and freight corridors. And among the traditional federal transportation programs, freight rail projects in particular (much like passenger rail) aren’t eligible projects.</p>
<p>So if a port is congested or wants to expand, there&#8217;s little available federal money to spend directly on rail or any other mode. Your choices are highways or highways. When a state or port does spend to improve operations, there is no accountability to make sure they&#8217;re actually reducing port/freight congestion, moving freight faster, or reducing air pollution in surrounding communities —  a significant issue of environmental justice.</p>
<p>Under this new bill, there would finally be a coordinated national policy for freight and ports across the country, and for the first time public health and air quality surrounding freight hubs and facilities become strong criteria for awarding dollars.</p>
<p>No matter what ports decide to spend money on to improve their operations, they&#8217;d have to consider air quality, greenhouse gas reductions, and noise and water pollution in the surrounding communities with future federal investments. On top of that, there would be a merit-based grant program for projects that do the best job of improving freight operations while using money most effectively and hitting the benchmarks laid out in the bill.</p>
<p>Benchmarks? The goals in the bill set a powerful framework for accountability, spelling out what they money should accomplish, so taxpayers can know that their money is being spent wisely.</p>
<div>
<ul>
<li>Reduce delays of goods and commodities entering into and out of intermodal connectors that serve international points of entry on an annual basis.</li>
<li>Increase travel time reliability on major freight corridors that connect major population centers with freight generators and international gateways on an annual basis.</li>
<li>Reduce by 10 percent the number of freight transportation-related fatalities by 2015.</li>
<li>Reduce national freight transportation-related carbon dioxide levels by 40 percent by 2030.</li>
<li>Reduce freight transportation-related air, water, and noise pollution and impacts on ecosystems and communities on an annual basis.</li>
</ul>
</div>
<p>For example, a port in a coastal city in California would have to consider the impacts on the health of those communities surrounding the port. Would investing in more freight rail capacity ease congestion, lower overall emissions, and reduce local air pollution? These are the kinds of questions that would have to be answered.</p>
<p>“A truly multimodal national freight program that is accountable to measurable performance targets and benchmarks is something the U.S. has needed for a long time,” said James Corless, director of Transportation for America in our press release.</p>
<p>“We applaud Senator Lautenberg for recognizing that our freight system can move our goods from coast to coast and power the economy while also being part of the solution for many of our most pressing problems: air quality, dangerous emissions, oil dependence, and congestion on our highways and interstates, to name just a few.”</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://t4america.org/blog/2010/07/23/what-does-the-freight-act-really-mean-for-our-freight-and-ports/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Senators Lautenberg, Murray and Cantwell Introduce Legislation for New Freight Program</title>
		<link>http://t4america.org/pressers/2010/07/23/senators-lautenberg-murray-and-cantwell-introduce-legislation-for-new-freight-program/</link>
		<comments>http://t4america.org/pressers/2010/07/23/senators-lautenberg-murray-and-cantwell-introduce-legislation-for-new-freight-program/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Jul 2010 16:43:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Transportation for America</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Press Releases]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cantwell]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[freight]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lautenberg]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[murray]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ports]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rail]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[senator]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://t4america.org/?p=6886</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[WASHINGTON, DC – Senator Frank Lautenberg (D-NJ), with co-sponsors Senator Patty Murray (D-WA) and Senator Maria Cantwell (D-WA), today introduced the Focusing Resources, Economic Investment, and Guidance to Help Transportation Act of 2010 (FREIGHT Act), a landmark bill, leading the charge to transform America’s transportation policy and investment by focusing on the freight network that enables goods and commodities to move about and reach their markets. The FREIGHT Act provides a visionary, comprehensive, systemic approach to infrastructure investment that addresses the nation’s commerce needs while providing a solid foundation that will also help our nation meet its energy, environmental and safety goals. ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>The FREIGHT Act of 2010 is a major shift in national transportation policy to support economic growth with targeted investment in efficient, clean, multimodal infrastructure for the movement of goods</em></p>
<p>WASHINGTON, DC – Senator Frank Lautenberg (D-NJ), with co-sponsors Senator Patty Murray (D-WA) and Senator Maria Cantwell (D-WA), today introduced the Focusing Resources, Economic Investment, and Guidance to Help Transportation Act of 2010 (FREIGHT Act), a landmark bill, leading the charge to transform America’s transportation policy and investment by focusing on the freight network that enables goods and commodities to move about and reach their markets. The FREIGHT Act provides a visionary, comprehensive, systemic approach to infrastructure investment that addresses the nation’s commerce needs while providing a solid foundation that will also help our nation meet its energy, environmental and safety goals. The bill also calls for the creation of a new National Freight Infrastructure Grants initiative – a competitive, merit-based program with broad eligibility for multimodal freight investment designed to focus funds where they will provide the most public benefit.</p>
<p>“Poor planning and underinvestment in our transportation infrastructure has led to increased congestion at our ports, highways, airports, and railways, and increases the cost of doing business. If we want to help U.S. businesses succeed and create new jobs, we need a freight transportation system that works better and can grow with the changing needs of the global economy,” said Senator Lautenberg in his statement.</p>
<p>“The FREIGHT Act is a paradigm shift our CAGTC members have long advocated and represents a bold step toward ensuring our nation’s economic competitiveness in the 21st century,” said Mortimer Downey, CAGTC Chairman, Senior Advisor, Parsons Brinckerhoff and former U.S. Deputy Secretary of Transportation. “For the first time ever, the bill establishes a comprehensive freight policy with outcome-based goals and creates a broad multimodal, competitive freight–specific program to provide the infrastructure necessary to move this country’s commerce and drive the economy.”</p>
<p>The FREIGHT Act of 2010 directs the Department of Transportation (USDOT) to develop and implement two institutional advances that will improve and coordinate policy within the federal government and the states. The first is a National Freight Transportation Strategic Plan to guide and inform goods movement infrastructure investments in future years. In addition, it calls for the creation of an Office of Freight Planning and Development, led by an Assistant Secretary for Freight Planning and Development. The bill instructs USDOT to develop baselines, tools and methods within two years to measure progress.</p>
<p>“A truly multimodal national freight program that is accountable to measurable performance targets and benchmarks is something the U.S. has needed for a long time,” said James Corless, director of Transportation for America. “We applaud Senator Lautenberg for recognizing that our freight system can move our goods from coast to coast and power the economy while also being part of the solution for many of our most pressing problems: air quality, dangerous emissions, oil dependence, and congestion on our highways and interstates, to name just a few.&#8221;</p>
<p>In developing the National Freight Transportation Policy, the FREIGHT Act also encourages concurrent improvements in air quality impacts, carbon emissions, energy use and public health and safety by establishing environmental goals to complement goals for reducing delays and improving travel time reliability on freight corridors, at gateways and heavy freight population centers. Similarly, the grant program sets criteria to prioritize projects that improve freight mobility and enhance economic growth, while incentivizing environmental improvements.</p>
<p>&#8220;Congress must modernize our outdated freight infrastructure to reduce its harmful environmental and public health impacts,&#8221; said Kathryn Phillips, a transportation expert with the Environmental Defense Fund. &#8220;This important bill provides a roadmap to target federal investment to create a cleaner, more reliable freight system for the 21st century.&#8221;</p>
<p>System performance is emphasized throughout the FREIGHT Act and projects will be judged on benefit-cost analysis. The significant overlap among public and private interests in the freight system is recognized through encouraged planning and cooperation with private sector interests, while the grant program leverages Federal investment by promoting non-Federal contributions to projects.</p>
<p>“The National Freight Infrastructure Investment Grants program proposed in this bill would be an important addition to the federal toolbox. It would help fund exactly the type of multi-modal, multi-jurisdictional, major transportation infrastructure projects that have historically been overlooked by the federal transportation investment process,&#8221; said Chuck Baker, CAGTC Member and President of the National Railroad Construction and Maintenance Association.</p>
<p>The Coalition for America’s Gateways and Trade Corridors, Environmental Defense Fund and Transportation for America commend Senator Lautenberg and the other co-sponsors of this visionary and strategically important policy. The three organizations have agreed to work together in support of the FREIGHT Act and call upon all in the transportation community to join in support.</p>
<p><strong>About CAGTC</strong><br />
The Coalition for America’s Gateways and Trade Corridors (CAGTC) is a diverse coalition of more than 60 organizations dedicated to increasing federal investment in America’s intermodal freight infrastructure. In contrast to single mode interests, CAGTC’s main mission is to promote a seamless goods movement transportation system across all modes to enhance capacity and economic growth. <a href="http://www.tradecorridors.org">www.tradecorridors.org</a> <a href="https://twitter.com/CAGTC">Twitter</a>.  <a href="http://www.facebook.com/pages/Coalition-for-Americas-Gateways-and-Trade-Corridors/261369164334">Facebook</a></p>
<p><strong>About EDF</strong><br />
A leading national nonprofit organization, Environmental Defense Fund represents more than 700,000 members. Since 1967, Environmental Defense Fund has linked science, economics, law and innovative private-sector partnerships to create breakthrough solutions to the most serious environmental problems. <a href="http://twitter.com/EnvDefenseFund">Twitter</a>,  Read our <a href="http://blogs.edf.org/transportation">Way2Go blog</a>, Website: <a href="http://www.edf.org/">www.edf.org/</a>. <a href="http://www.facebook.com/EnvDefenseFund">Facebook</a>.</p>
<p><strong>About Transportation for America</strong><br />
Transportation for America is a growing, national coalition committed to creating a new national transportation program that will take America to the 21st Century by building a modernized infrastructure and healthy communities where people can live, work, and play. <a href="http://www.t4america.org">www.t4america.org</a></p>
<p><strong>About National Railroad Construction and Maintenance Association.</strong><br />
The National Railroad Construction and Maintenance Association is the national trade association organized to serve the needs of railroad contractors, suppliers, and the entire railroad and rail transit construction industry. <a href="http://www.nrcma.org">www.nrcma.org</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://t4america.org/pressers/2010/07/23/senators-lautenberg-murray-and-cantwell-introduce-legislation-for-new-freight-program/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Transportation for America Applauds Senate’s Release Of National Transportation Objectives</title>
		<link>http://t4america.org/pressers/2009/05/15/transportation-for-america-applauds-senate%e2%80%99s-release-of-national-transportation-objectives/</link>
		<comments>http://t4america.org/pressers/2009/05/15/transportation-for-america-applauds-senate%e2%80%99s-release-of-national-transportation-objectives/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 May 2009 19:08:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Transportation for America</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Press Releases]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[john rockefeller]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lautenberg]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[senate]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://t4america.org/?p=1702</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Today, Sen. John D. (Jay) Rockefeller (D-W.Va.), chairman of the Commerce, Science and Transportation Committee, and Sen. Frank Lautenberg (D-N.J.) introduced legislation that lays out clear objectives for the upcoming national transportation bill, designed to meet the economic, energy, environmental, and social-demographic challenges of the future. ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<table style="margin-top: 10px; margin-bottom: 10px; margin-left: 10px; background-color: #f1f2f3; height: 49px;" border="0" cellpadding="5" width="118" align="right">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td><strong>CONTACT:</strong><br />
Cosabeth Bullock<br />
202-478-6128<br />
cbullock@mrss.com</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p>For Immediate Release:<br />
May 14, 2009</p>
<p>WASHINGTON &#8211; Today, Sen. John D. (Jay) Rockefeller (D-W.Va.), chairman of the Commerce, Science and Transportation Committee, and Sen. Frank Lautenberg (D-N.J.) introduced legislation that lays out clear objectives for the upcoming national transportation bill, designed to meet the economic, energy, environmental, and social-demographic challenges of the future.</p>
<p>As Congress prepares to debate a six-year authorization bill — the current one expires Sep. 30 — the Rockefeller-Lautenberg measure highlights a growing consensus among legislators and the public that a continuation of the status quo will not do.  The bill articulates a bold new vision for our transportation policy that addresses the 21st century needs of our economy, energy, our climate and our health.  In introducing this bill before the debate over allocating transportation funds commences, the senators are acknowledging that Americans want to see a vision for what the transportation bill will achieve before they will be willing to spend more money.</p>
<p>Transportation for America applauds the measure’s aggressive performance targets, including goals to increase system safety, repair and maintain our existing networks, and reduce national surface transportation-generated carbon dioxide. Setting such concrete goals is a bold departure from current practice, whereby transportation agencies receive what amounts to a blank check, without being asked to account for achieving national objectives.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://t4america.org/pressers/2009/05/15/transportation-for-america-applauds-senate%e2%80%99s-release-of-national-transportation-objectives/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

