“We’ve proposed the very first national policy aimed at both increasing fuel economy and reducing greenhouse gas pollution for all new cars and trucks — a standard that will also save consumers money and our nation oil,” Obama said.

The Obama administration should be commended for its bold action on new fuel economy standards for all American cars and trucks. But his transportation policy needs to be even bolder. Americans are yearning for new choices that relieve them at the pump and get them off of our clogged highways. While a measly one percent of the House climate change bill is allocated toward clean transit, Obama has the opportunity to make a strong stand for additional funds in the Senate version.

Obama concluded his remarks by calling for practical solutions and a willingness to put the needs of future generations over the quick-fixes of today.

“For if we are flexible and pragmatic, if we can resolve to work tirelessly in common effort, then we will achieve our common purpose: a world that is safer, cleaner, and healthier than the one we found; and a future that is worthy of our children,” he said.

T4 America is currently focused on making sure that a share of revenues generated by the climate bill will be directed into cleaner transportation choices, but there’s been some question about exactly which strategies and investments will be the best bet for getting the cuts we need to meet our ambitious targets.

Building on the 2008 release of Growing Cooler, which showed how increases in driving and population would wipe out gains in fuel mileage technology, Moving Cooler makes the case that we need to look beyond the idea that newer, more efficient cars or low-carbon fuels will be enough on their own to achieve the big reductions we’ll need to meet our targets. What other strategies can we employ to get there from here?

The report looks at “bundles” of different techniques for reducing emissions from transportation — like road pricing, intelligent transportation systems, increased public transportation, pay-as-you-drive insurance, and making walking and biking safer and more convenient, to name a few — and finds that we could cut transportation emissions by as much as 47 percent if we employed all the tools examined in Moving Cooler.

Implementing some of these strategies would help cut emissions, but also provide Americans with numerous other benefits.

Offering more good options for living and getting around while using less oil will reduce our individual and national vulnerability to disruptions in either the oil supply or the climate. Giving more people the opportunity to drive less to accomplish daily tasks is essential to any long-lasting strategy. The best message from this report is that we can increase personal choice and freedom without imposing unnecessary hardships.

Growing Cooler showed that people living in more efficient, less automobile dependent environments drive about a third less, on average. Meeting the growing demand for more housing and travel choices would reduce driving and become a significant factor in fighting climate change.

Moving Cooler shows how a combination of public investment and market forces can unleash the private sector to help reduce our carbon footprint and reduce oil dependency by giving people the types of transportation choices they are increasingly looking for.

• Health researchers note that obesity and climate change have many of the same roots — including an auto-dependent lifestyle. (Grist)

• The unpredictable nature of climate change could have dangerous effects on our transportation system. (ClimateBiz)

• Train executives see the link between climate change, energy, and transportation. (CNN)

• Zipcar founder Robin Chase speaks about ride sharing, transportation costs, and infrastructure. (Infrastructurist)

• A look at the worst cities for angry drivers. (Reuters)

• Budget shortfalls force Michigan to cancel $740 million in roadwork. (Detroit News)

• San Francisco looks to increase parking fees, tolls, and tickets to better reflect the real cost of driving. (San Francisco Examiner)

• Senator Orrin Hatch has a close call with a pedestrian while driving around the Washington.

Ed. note: This is a continuing series of posts breaking down the six objectives in our Route to Reform Blueprint. While we’re trying to explain the Blueprint in simpler terms, it’s a document full of complicated policies geared at Congress and these posts are fairly detailed.

On Wednesday, we looked at the second of our six National Transportation Objectives and two corresponding performance targets. This second objective describes our goal of building a transportation system that protects our communities from pollution, preserves our environment, and helps us protect our climate.

As a refresher:

As we’ve noted in our previous post, transportation comprises 30 percent of our greenhouse gas emissions. Simply put, to address climate change and global warming, we’re going to have to cut carbon emissions from the transportation sector across the board.

We can begin by creating cleaner fuels and using more efficient cars, buses, and trains. In this respect, this week’s announcement by the Obama administration of increased efficiency standards is an important step. But if we expect to reach the widely accepted goal of an 80 percent reduction in greenhouse gases by 2050, we can’t just drive cars that don’t emit as much pollution or get better mileage. We need a transportation policy that helps us drive less, that provides better and cleaner options, that makes it easy for us to walk to the store, and that allows us to live closer to our schools and jobs.

Reducing emissions and pollution from our transportation system is also an important step in making Americans healthier. Today, low-income people are subject to an undue share of the negative effects of our transportation policy; oftentimes, the less money you make the more at-risk you are for asthma and numerous other ailments tied to the quality of our air and water. Transportation for America not only is making environmental protection a goal of our Blueprint, but is also calling for policies that promote environmental justice and help protect at-risk populations.

While the programs throughout the entire Blueprint are geared towards meeting this objective of climate stability and environmental protection, we’re including a few examples of our policies and priorities here to give you a general sense of how we plan to achieve this goal.

Climate and transportation legislation must work together.

As we’ve pointed out, environmental protection and transportation are inextricably tied together. For that reason, Transportation for America believes that revenues raised by cap-and-trade revenue should be reinvested in the kinds of transportation options that will lower emissions from the transportation sector. Our Energy Security for Clean Communities Program calls for the allocation of 10 percent of climate legislation revenue to fund clean transportation investments.

Under this program, 10 percent of climate auction revenues would be allocated to states and regions for the development of plans and strategies to reduce vehicle miles traveled and carbon emissions. For example, if a region determines during their planning process that congestion pricing could help lower their area’s total vehicle miles traveled, they can use money from this program to help fund its implementation. (p.30 in the Blueprint)

Congress must reaffirm its commitment to clean air and clean water.

Congress established CMAQ (Congestion Mitigation and Air Quality Improvement) program in 1991 to steer transportation funds to eligible projects that could help specific areas reduce congestion and improve air quality. T4 America believe this program is an essential, and we propose that it be elevated and expanded to allow CMAQ funds to be used in four additional areas: vehicle efficiency, low carbon fuels, VMT reduction (as illustrated in the previous paragraph), and system efficiency improvements. (p.30)

To make our communities more sustainable, we need to link transportation to land use, housing, and other local issues.

T4′s Sustainability Challenge Grants program will provide targeted grants to visionary communities to develop the innovative solutions needed to encourage shifts to cleaner modes, link local planning objectives, and create more sustainable towns and cities. By creating a flexible program that allows funds to be used for these interdisciplinary issues, we believe the next transportation bill can help us take a big step forward in developing broader solutions to issues of transportation, land-use, urban planning, sustainability, and economic growth. (p.42)

Focusing on the best projects to meet the targets, rather than on specific modes

Our current one-size-fits-all system means that transportation problems in rural areas, small towns, or large metropolitan areas often get treated with the same single-minded solutions. To address the vastly different and locally sensitive needs of our communities, Transportation for America is recommending the the creation of Multimodal Access Programs (MAP). This represents a fundamental change in policy in shifting from a modal (roads vs. rails vs. trails etc.) focus, to one where states and regions can choose the solution that will best help them meet the national objectives and performance targets. (p. 33-34)

Funds in this program could be spent on highway, bridge, transit, bicycle, pedestrian and rail projects; but rather than focusing blindly on a specific mode of investment, this program is structured so that states and regions will have to demonstrate that they’re using a diverse package of investments to meet the national performance targets. It would put all the different modes of transportation on an equal footing under one program — and ask states and regions to focus on improving overall access and mobility — rather than pitting them against each other in a zero-sum battle on a tilted playing field.

As we said earlier, these are just a few examples of programs tied to these objectives and targets, and they don’t provide a full picture of how we’ll achieve our climate and environmental protection objective goals. You can read the full Blueprint for more — start on page 65 to get a clear introduction to our performance targets and the rationale behind them — and stay tuned as we continue this series next week.

As we’ve discussed here before, our Blueprint has six overarching national objectives, which we believe should provide a vision for the future and a guide for our federal transportation policy. One of the biggest criticisms leveled at our country’s transportation spending is that there are no clear goals for what the money should accomplish. Therefore, T4 America is looking to define a clear purpose for our system — and these six objectives are like the rudder to steer the ship.

To ensure that we can meet these objectives and measure our progress, we created 10 performance targets — clear, quantifiable goals for the next 20 years that are tied directly to the six national objectives. (You can see the two that most directly link in with this objective at the top of this post.)

Our country needs a transportation system that keeps our air clean, helps us fight climate change, and protects all Americans — no matter who they are or where they live — from dangerous environmental pollution. Unfortunately, our existing policies — which subsidize sprawling development and foster dependence on automobiles — have made protecting our environment and our communities an increasingly challenging task.

Thirty percent of greenhouse gas emissions in the United States comes from transportation, which produces more CO2 than any other country’s entire economy, save China. And while policymakers in Congress have mandated increased fuel efficiency for automakers in order to help reduce emissions, the sheer growth in the number of miles Americans drive — and lack of other viable transportation options — threatens to overwhelm these benefits.

As we described in our previous post on public health and safety, pollution from automobiles and other sources can have devastating effects on people’s health, particularly in the poorer or impoverished communities that often bear the brunt of these negative impacts.

In order to guide our transportation program and help create a safer, cleaner, and healthier system, Transportation for America believes in that we should strive to meet these two performance measures:

1. Reduce transportation-generated carbon dioxide levels by 40%.
2. Achieve zero percent exposure to at-risk levels of air pollution.

To achieve these goals, we’re going to need some real reforms, direct accountability, and a strong commitment to a 21st transportation system. This commitment must include the construction of the second half of our transportation network — including public transportation, bike and pedestrians paths, and high-speed rail — a stronger linkage between transportation and land use policies, and repairs and maintenance on our existing infrastructure to help Americans save time, money and fuel. Investing in the transportation systems that emit less pollution while moving people more efficiently will help us reach these ambitious targets.

To get a better idea of how we plan to enact these reforms, check back later this week when we dive into the specific policies and proposals that T4 America is supporting — and see how an improved transportation system can protect our environment, fight climate change, and foster healthy, clean, pollution-free communities.

• Community opposition kills a planned highway expansion in Los Angeles. (Los Angeles Times)

• The American Lung Association looks at the country’s most polluted cities. (City Mayors)

Nearly 150 transportation practitioners, environmental advocates, and green energy supporters signed up for our second webinar yesterday, focusing on Transportation and the Environment.

Transportation is the second largest and fastest growing source of greenhouse gas emissions. In addition to producing many other benefits, public transportation, rail, and bike and pedestrian infrastructure already help reduce greenhouse gas pollution by millions of CO2 tons each day.

Transportation for America held this online discussion to explore how building the second half of our transportation system and reforming our local, state and federal transportation policies can help conserve oil and contribute to meeting the nation’s energy goals.

Deron Lovaas, Federal Transportation Policy Director for the Natural Resources Defense Council, moderated the discussion and provided an overview of the greenhouse gas reductions possible from the transportation sector and the potential benefits of a U.S. cap-and-trade system.

John Holtzclaw, of the Sierra Club’s 21st Century Transportation Committee, discussed the costs of sprawl versus the benefis of compact, walkable develoment patterns. Joshua Saks, with the Chesapeake Bay Foundation presented an overview of the impacts of transportation on water quality. Finally, Michael Replogle, Transportation Director for the Living Cities Program at the Environmental Defense Fund, discussed the impacts of the transportation system on climate change and opportunities to ensure a low-carbon transportation system is possible in the future.

For those of you who attended the session, check out the Transportation for America Policy Brief on the issue and view a transcript of the presenters’ responses to your questions. This policy brief (available for download now), Transportation and Climate: A Critical Linkage, covers three basic ideas:

1. The transportation system no longer supports the American Dream – a dream of livable communities free from pollution with less time spent in traffic, less oil use, and less global warming.
2. Poorly planned transportation spending out of step with local needs has restructured America’s landscape and put enormous pressure on our natural resources
3. While federal legislation has done much to mitigate environmental degradation, the benefits of these efforts — especially in air quality and water quality — are gradually being overtaken by growth in motor vehicle traffic and urban sprawl.

Download it now and feel free to pass it along to friends and colleagues. And be sure to join Transportation for America to help us tell Congress that smarter transportation investments should be part of any climate solution.

Webinar resources:

• Audio and video recording of the entire webinar (click to launch in a new window)
• A summary of the questions asked and responses (pdf)
• T4 Policy Brief on Transportation, Climate and Energy (pdf)
• Register for more upcoming webinars

Washington — Chairman Henry A. Waxman (D-CA) and members of the House Energy and Commerce Committee are to be commended for releasing a clean energy bill that makes significant advances on long overdue legislation to address the impact of transportation on our climate. The bill contains a number of major provisions that will set the country on the path to lower greenhouse gas emissions.

Transportation systems contribute approximately one third of the total annual CO2 emissions in the U.S. Right now more than half of U.S. households lack ready access to transportation options that will reduce individual CO2 emissions and help stem global warming. If we are going to successfully combat global warming, the clean energy bill must offer meaningful financial and regulatory incentives for states and metropolitan regions to design and implement aggressive plans that provide residents with cleaner transportation options and begin to modernize our national transportation program. The historic nature of this moment presents a unique chance to establish a new era of environment and energy standards for our transportation system that should not be missed, and Transportation for America stands ready to support Chairman Waxman’s efforts to fully seize the opportunity.