<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: T4 America: Prioritize Transportation Investments that Keep More People Working in Meeting President’s Call for New Jobs Measure</title>
	<atom:link href="http://t4america.org/pressers/2010/01/28/t4-america-prioritize-transportation-investments-that-keep-more-people-working-in-meeting-president%e2%80%99s-call-for-new-jobs-measure/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://t4america.org/pressers/2010/01/28/t4-america-prioritize-transportation-investments-that-keep-more-people-working-in-meeting-president%e2%80%99s-call-for-new-jobs-measure/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 22:36:19 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: EV Conversion Steps</title>
		<link>http://t4america.org/pressers/2010/01/28/t4-america-prioritize-transportation-investments-that-keep-more-people-working-in-meeting-president%e2%80%99s-call-for-new-jobs-measure/#comment-4693</link>
		<dc:creator>EV Conversion Steps</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 Feb 2010 11:04:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://t4america.org/?p=5275#comment-4693</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;EV Conversion Steps...&lt;/strong&gt;

We also bought a three month subscription to Carfax. We were considering buying through a private party, and with Carfax, you can see the owner history of the car you are considering. It’ s important to know if the car has a history of an accident, or ...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>EV Conversion Steps&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>We also bought a three month subscription to Carfax. We were considering buying through a private party, and with Carfax, you can see the owner history of the car you are considering. It’ s important to know if the car has a history of an accident, or &#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andy Singer</title>
		<link>http://t4america.org/pressers/2010/01/28/t4-america-prioritize-transportation-investments-that-keep-more-people-working-in-meeting-president%e2%80%99s-call-for-new-jobs-measure/#comment-4499</link>
		<dc:creator>Andy Singer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Jan 2010 04:44:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://t4america.org/?p=5275#comment-4499</guid>
		<description>While I totally agree with T4America that subsidizing existing transit and repairing existing roads is a much better way to spend stimulus money than building new highway projects, I disagree with the line of argument. It is true that new highway projects create almost no long-term jobs ...but new fixed rail transit projects DO create a lot of jobs and force cities and states to commit themselves to particular transit routes and corridors in a way that&#039;s not possible with buses.

More importantly, T4American needs to take a &quot;No new roads&quot; (or &quot;pavement moratorium&quot;) stance, not so much because of the jobs issue but because the nation needs to reduce Vehicle Miles Travelled if it is going to tackle climate change and Peak Oil. There is simply no way to reduce America&#039;s carbon emissions and oil consumption if we continue to build new highways and new highway lanes, and this point needs to be impressed upon state and federal politicians and the public.

Also, mechanisms need to be forced on states to make sure that Federal highway funds don&#039;t end up funding new construction projects (by freeing up state highway money that would otherwise have to be spent on maintenance). Despite their claims to the contrary, many states and especially midwestern states are rolling in state gas tax and tab fee money and have lots of new highway construction projects under way or in the planning stages. They should be forced to spend this money on maintenance or transit. So how about a stipulation that, if a state has lots of new highway projects or lane-widening/new lane projects, they can&#039;t qualify (or have a reduced ability to qualify) for Federal highway money?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>While I totally agree with T4America that subsidizing existing transit and repairing existing roads is a much better way to spend stimulus money than building new highway projects, I disagree with the line of argument. It is true that new highway projects create almost no long-term jobs &#8230;but new fixed rail transit projects DO create a lot of jobs and force cities and states to commit themselves to particular transit routes and corridors in a way that&#8217;s not possible with buses.</p>
<p>More importantly, T4American needs to take a &#8220;No new roads&#8221; (or &#8220;pavement moratorium&#8221;) stance, not so much because of the jobs issue but because the nation needs to reduce Vehicle Miles Travelled if it is going to tackle climate change and Peak Oil. There is simply no way to reduce America&#8217;s carbon emissions and oil consumption if we continue to build new highways and new highway lanes, and this point needs to be impressed upon state and federal politicians and the public.</p>
<p>Also, mechanisms need to be forced on states to make sure that Federal highway funds don&#8217;t end up funding new construction projects (by freeing up state highway money that would otherwise have to be spent on maintenance). Despite their claims to the contrary, many states and especially midwestern states are rolling in state gas tax and tab fee money and have lots of new highway construction projects under way or in the planning stages. They should be forced to spend this money on maintenance or transit. So how about a stipulation that, if a state has lots of new highway projects or lane-widening/new lane projects, they can&#8217;t qualify (or have a reduced ability to qualify) for Federal highway money?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

