<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: FAQ: What are rescissions? Will my state lose transportation money?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://t4america.org/blog/2009/10/05/faq-what-are-rescissions-will-my-state-lose-transportation-money/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://t4america.org/blog/2009/10/05/faq-what-are-rescissions-will-my-state-lose-transportation-money/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 22:36:19 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Wisconsin Slips to #3: Explained &#124; Over the Bars in Milwaukee</title>
		<link>http://t4america.org/blog/2009/10/05/faq-what-are-rescissions-will-my-state-lose-transportation-money/#comment-7907</link>
		<dc:creator>Wisconsin Slips to #3: Explained &#124; Over the Bars in Milwaukee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 May 2011 16:02:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://t4america.org/?p=3847#comment-7907</guid>
		<description>[...] rescission is the cancellation of some amount of a state’s funds that have not been obligated to a contract [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] rescission is the cancellation of some amount of a state’s funds that have not been obligated to a contract [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Streetsblog Capitol Hill &#187; Street Safety Projects Threatened as States Give Transpo $ Back to Feds</title>
		<link>http://t4america.org/blog/2009/10/05/faq-what-are-rescissions-will-my-state-lose-transportation-money/#comment-5999</link>
		<dc:creator>Streetsblog Capitol Hill &#187; Street Safety Projects Threatened as States Give Transpo $ Back to Feds</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Aug 2010 16:51:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://t4america.org/?p=3847#comment-5999</guid>
		<description>[...] risk of getting scaled back. Photo: Tanya SnyderThis isn’t coming out of the blue. It’s part of a game Congress played five years back, when they approved more transportation funding than the White House would allow. They left the [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] risk of getting scaled back. Photo: Tanya SnyderThis isn’t coming out of the blue. It’s part of a game Congress played five years back, when they approved more transportation funding than the White House would allow. They left the [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: No funding for Huntsville bike safety campaign &#124; Cyclelicious</title>
		<link>http://t4america.org/blog/2009/10/05/faq-what-are-rescissions-will-my-state-lose-transportation-money/#comment-4677</link>
		<dc:creator>No funding for Huntsville bike safety campaign &#124; Cyclelicious</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Feb 2010 16:57:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://t4america.org/?p=3847#comment-4677</guid>
		<description>[...] rescissions compound the problem. The US Congress rescinded nearly $9 billion in Federal transportation funds, mostly in defense funding bills. The state of Alabama lost $176 million or 36% of their 2009 [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] rescissions compound the problem. The US Congress rescinded nearly $9 billion in Federal transportation funds, mostly in defense funding bills. The state of Alabama lost $176 million or 36% of their 2009 [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Henderson</title>
		<link>http://t4america.org/blog/2009/10/05/faq-what-are-rescissions-will-my-state-lose-transportation-money/#comment-4506</link>
		<dc:creator>David Henderson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Jan 2010 22:42:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://t4america.org/?p=3847#comment-4506</guid>
		<description>Are all rescissions taken from the current year or are funds taken from future budget years also?

Thanks,

David Henderson</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Are all rescissions taken from the current year or are funds taken from future budget years also?</p>
<p>Thanks,</p>
<p>David Henderson</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steven can plan &#8211; What&#8217;s up with SAFETEA-LU</title>
		<link>http://t4america.org/blog/2009/10/05/faq-what-are-rescissions-will-my-state-lose-transportation-money/#comment-3868</link>
		<dc:creator>Steven can plan &#8211; What&#8217;s up with SAFETEA-LU</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Nov 2009 20:15:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://t4america.org/?p=3847#comment-3868</guid>
		<description>[...] Built into SAFETEA-LU upon its creation, language in the law allowed Congress to rescind $8.7 billion from states. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Built into SAFETEA-LU upon its creation, language in the law allowed Congress to rescind $8.7 billion from states. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cuyahoga County Planning Commission Weblog</title>
		<link>http://t4america.org/blog/2009/10/05/faq-what-are-rescissions-will-my-state-lose-transportation-money/#comment-3206</link>
		<dc:creator>Cuyahoga County Planning Commission Weblog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Oct 2009 20:06:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://t4america.org/?p=3847#comment-3206</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Federal rescission impacts clean transportation...&lt;/strong&gt;

While Congress passed an one-month extension of SAFETEA-LU, the 2005 transportation law, it did not cancel the $8.7 billion rescission included in the old bill. The cuts have hit alternative transportation projects especially hard, and Ohio is among th...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Federal rescission impacts clean transportation&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>While Congress passed an one-month extension of SAFETEA-LU, the 2005 transportation law, it did not cancel the $8.7 billion rescission included in the old bill. The cuts have hit alternative transportation projects especially hard, and Ohio is among th&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michigan stands to lose millions in trail funding &#124; m-bike.org</title>
		<link>http://t4america.org/blog/2009/10/05/faq-what-are-rescissions-will-my-state-lose-transportation-money/#comment-3140</link>
		<dc:creator>Michigan stands to lose millions in trail funding &#124; m-bike.org</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Oct 2009 04:57:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://t4america.org/?p=3847#comment-3140</guid>
		<description>[...] a provision whereas unspent transportation money could be pulled back from the states. It&#8217;s called a rescission and it took affect at the end of last [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] a provision whereas unspent transportation money could be pulled back from the states. It&#8217;s called a rescission and it took affect at the end of last [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

