Transportation For America » Though a Worthy Down Payment, Stimulus Raises Urgent Need for New Transportation Vision

Though a Worthy Down Payment, Stimulus Raises Urgent Need for New Transportation Vision

February 13, 2009
By Stephen Lee Davis

	Download this Release (.pdf) Download this Release (.doc)
	Contact: David Goldberg 202-412-7930 david.goldberg@t4america.org Ben Grossman-Cohen 202-478-6185 bgrossman-cohen@mrss.com

WASHINGTON, D.C. – The transportation spending priorities in the stimulus bill conference report passed by the House of Representatives today are a significant departure from the status quo and ought to represent the leading edge of a major new thrust in our national infrastructure policy. The Senate is expected to pass the conference report as soon as tonight.

Given the need for haste in crafting the bill, congressional and Administration negotiators were handcuffed by backward-looking, existing programs even as they tried to shape investments for a future of reduced oil dependency, greater opportunity for Americans to join the middle class and cleaner transportation choices. Despite some shortcomings resulting from current transportation law, Congress has adopted a bill that if properly enacted by state and local authorities, could be a down payment on a new direction for America’s infrastructure:

$27.5 billion allocated to the Surface Transportation Program (STP) that should go a long way to restoring our transportation networks to a state of good repair. Unfortunately, Congress neglected to include language ensuring this money is prioritized to fix crumbling roads and bridges, so now the onus is on state and local governments to ensure these funds are not spent improperly.
Unprecedented flexibility for spending STP funds — traditionally spent mostly on highways — on ports, transit, passenger and freight rail or other projects as national, state or regional needs may require.
A significant share of transportation dollars directed to local decision makers and metropolitan regions rather than state departments of transportation.
$8.4 billion for public transportation, recognizing the strong and growing demand for transit service. However, none of these funds can be used to prevent cuts in service and jobs at transit agencies suffering from massive budget shortfalls. It is up to Congress to ensure this gap is filled in upcoming appropriations negotiations.
$9.3 billion for intercity and high-speed passenger rail, an encouraging indication that Congress realizes how important it is to expand alternatives to our overburdened highway and aviation networks.
The inclusion of up to $825 million for projects that will make our streets safer for walking and biking, providing help for commuters who have increasingly turned to these alternatives to save money and increase their physical activity.

When President Obama signs the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act, it will provide a down payment on the transportation investment needed to get our economy moving. But the urgency of recreating our national transportation program to address the challenges of the future is more starkly clear than ever.

Now Congress and the Obama-Biden administration must begin consideration of the successor legislation to the expiring SAFETEA-LU law — our current, 1950s-era federal transportation program. This critically important legislation must provide a new 21st Century vision for investment in our transportation system that is safer, healthier, cleaner, more equitable and smarter so that our nation can compete and thrive in the future economy.

Filed under: Campaign Blog
Tags: congress, economic recovery, Press Releases, senate, stimulus

http://la.streetsblog.org/2009/02/18/the-stimulus-bill-time-to-start-following-the-money/ Streetsblog » The Stimulus Bill: Time to Start Following the Money

[...] Reinvestment Act of 2009", a handy roundup of the act’s transportation funding provisions. T4A is calling the act "a significant departure from the status quo [that] ought to represent the leading [...]
Rene Van Caneghem

Bussing has been extremely expensive and has been, to my mind, of very doubtful value. I would urge that bussing be restricted to those who live more than 2 miles from the school. Those living 2 miles or less from the school can be driven there by their parents and the kids can probably walk back home after school.